<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A really used camera</title> <atom:link href="http://leicarumors.com/2009/01/21/a-really-used-camera.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/01/21/a-really-used-camera.aspx/</link> <description>Leica news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: LR admin</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/01/21/a-really-used-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-480</link> <dc:creator>LR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:07:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=719#comment-480</guid> <description>Greg, this was exactly my question - is this marking practically possible? Thanks for your answer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, this was exactly my question &#8211; is this marking practically possible? Thanks for your answer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: greg</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/01/21/a-really-used-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link> <dc:creator>greg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:06:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=719#comment-478</guid> <description>Not sure what your question is... is it about how mucked-up the pressure plate in Winograd&#039;s camera is... or why the black M3&#039;s is so clean? Winograd shot literally tens of thousands of rolls of film... there are STILL somewhere around 8000 undeveloped rolls of Tri-X in his estate. The markings on the Winograd camera&#039;s plate are a combination of wear, and likely dirt/muck/grunge left by thousands of rolls of film moving through the camera. Since the camera is an Artifact, and no longer a Tool, there is no incentive to clean it off. Winograd fans WANT to see the film muck that he left on there.The black M3 may or may not have had nearly as many rolls go through... and, just to make this THAT much more complicated... some M3&#039;s had black glass pressure plates, that were more easily cleaned off, than black-enameled aluminum.Greg.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what your question is&#8230; is it about how mucked-up the pressure plate in Winograd&#8217;s camera is&#8230; or why the black M3&#8242;s is so clean? Winograd shot literally tens of thousands of rolls of film&#8230; there are STILL somewhere around 8000 undeveloped rolls of Tri-X in his estate. The markings on the Winograd camera&#8217;s plate are a combination of wear, and likely dirt/muck/grunge left by thousands of rolls of film moving through the camera. Since the camera is an Artifact, and no longer a Tool, there is no incentive to clean it off. Winograd fans WANT to see the film muck that he left on there.</p><p>The black M3 may or may not have had nearly as many rolls go through&#8230; and, just to make this THAT much more complicated&#8230; some M3&#8242;s had black glass pressure plates, that were more easily cleaned off, than black-enameled aluminum.</p><p>Greg.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fotomik</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/01/21/a-really-used-camera.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link> <dc:creator>fotomik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:45:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=719#comment-477</guid> <description>As far as I recall, that one was indeed Winogrand&#039;s camera. That was a few years ago.
That M3 though... Quite a lot of money for a camera that hasn&#039;t been owned by anyone famous.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I recall, that one was indeed Winogrand&#8217;s camera. That was a few years ago.<br
/> That M3 though&#8230; Quite a lot of money for a camera that hasn&#8217;t been owned by anyone famous.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 259/277 objects using memcached

Served from: leicarumors.com @ 2012-02-08 13:47:16 -->
