<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leica D-Lux 5 in Photokina 2010?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leicarumors.com/2009/04/24/leica-d-lux-5-in-photokina-2010.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/04/24/leica-d-lux-5-in-photokina-2010.aspx/</link>
	<description>Leica news, before they happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:02:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob. S.</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/04/24/leica-d-lux-5-in-photokina-2010.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob. S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1162#comment-875</guid>
		<description>Seems I can only find this extremely short hint, published in dpreview&#039;s PMA interview with Panasonic (http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09031901panasonicinterview.asp). dpr: &quot;So when you&#039;re designing a lens now you&#039;re designing it partly optically and partly digitally?&quot; Panasonic: &quot;Yes. Of course we work closely with the lens engineers. But Leica doesn&#039;t allow us to use digital corrections, so that&#039;s why there are no Leica lenses for the Micro G system. But of course, we have a plan with Leica as part of the roadmap.&quot; Which gives no specifics regarding what kind of products there will be, but it suggests both bodies and lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems I can only find this extremely short hint, published in dpreview&#8217;s PMA interview with Panasonic (<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09031901panasonicinterview.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09031901panasonicinterview.asp</a>). dpr: &#8220;So when you&#8217;re designing a lens now you&#8217;re designing it partly optically and partly digitally?&#8221; Panasonic: &#8220;Yes. Of course we work closely with the lens engineers. But Leica doesn&#8217;t allow us to use digital corrections, so that&#8217;s why there are no Leica lenses for the Micro G system. But of course, we have a plan with Leica as part of the roadmap.&#8221; Which gives no specifics regarding what kind of products there will be, but it suggests both bodies and lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LR admin</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/04/24/leica-d-lux-5-in-photokina-2010.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>LR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1162#comment-873</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rob - yes, I know those are just designer&#039;s view on the camera - I discussed those before already. When did Panasonic announced that they will have a 4/3 with a Leica label on it? I am not aware of such announcement and I am following this daily. Please prove a link, I may have missed it.
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rob &#8211; yes, I know those are just designer&#8217;s view on the camera &#8211; I discussed those before already. When did Panasonic announced that they will have a 4/3 with a Leica label on it? I am not aware of such announcement and I am following this daily. Please prove a link, I may have missed it.<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob. S.</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/04/24/leica-d-lux-5-in-photokina-2010.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob. S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1162#comment-872</guid>
		<description>Sorry to disappoint, but those images are fakes (as 43rumors.com does say), they&#039;ve been circulating in the dpreview.com forums even before Photokina 2008, made by a forum user with too much time on his hands...

Panasonic did already announce that there may be top-of-the-line Micro Four Thirds products with the Leica label on them, so that part may still come true, even if no one can say what they will look like. But with Leica fully engaged in finishing their S2 and preparing the new R series at the same time, it is to be expected that a hypothetical D-Lux 5 will become just a Leica branded Panasonic camera, as the D-Lux 3 has been. 

Which  in retrospect is a great pity, by the way â€šÃ„Ã¶âˆšÃ‘âˆšÂ¨ had the D-Lux 3 been a real Leica, and had Panasonic&#039;s and Leica&#039;s involvement in Four Thirds been really serious even before Panasonic came up with Micro Four Thirds, then today we might have a substantial second arm of Four Thirds with two or three extremely interesting bodies and a substantial line-up of excellent lenses.

For a &quot;simple&quot; Leica branded Panasonic Micro Four Thirds body to become a success, I think it would have either to be more competitively priced than the D-Lux 3, or to offer unique features, maybe especially for both existing and prospective Leica enthusiasts. By which I&#039;m thinking of mechanical and electrical compatibility with M series lenses, including support for an automatic diaphragm, to add an open-aperture mode to the usual working-aperture mode which is all we get with adapted lenses until now. Although the electronic viewfinder makes working-aperture mode more practical than it used to be with optical viewfinders, it still remains a kludge which makes both focusing and light metering more difficult and, at smaller apertures, takes the live view feature to its limits, too.

Cheers,
Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to disappoint, but those images are fakes (as 43rumors.com does say), they&#8217;ve been circulating in the dpreview.com forums even before Photokina 2008, made by a forum user with too much time on his hands&#8230;</p>
<p>Panasonic did already announce that there may be top-of-the-line Micro Four Thirds products with the Leica label on them, so that part may still come true, even if no one can say what they will look like. But with Leica fully engaged in finishing their S2 and preparing the new R series at the same time, it is to be expected that a hypothetical D-Lux 5 will become just a Leica branded Panasonic camera, as the D-Lux 3 has been. </p>
<p>Which  in retrospect is a great pity, by the way â€šÃ„Ã¶âˆšÃ‘âˆšÂ¨ had the D-Lux 3 been a real Leica, and had Panasonic&#8217;s and Leica&#8217;s involvement in Four Thirds been really serious even before Panasonic came up with Micro Four Thirds, then today we might have a substantial second arm of Four Thirds with two or three extremely interesting bodies and a substantial line-up of excellent lenses.</p>
<p>For a &#8220;simple&#8221; Leica branded Panasonic Micro Four Thirds body to become a success, I think it would have either to be more competitively priced than the D-Lux 3, or to offer unique features, maybe especially for both existing and prospective Leica enthusiasts. By which I&#8217;m thinking of mechanical and electrical compatibility with M series lenses, including support for an automatic diaphragm, to add an open-aperture mode to the usual working-aperture mode which is all we get with adapted lenses until now. Although the electronic viewfinder makes working-aperture mode more practical than it used to be with optical viewfinders, it still remains a kludge which makes both focusing and light metering more difficult and, at smaller apertures, takes the live view feature to its limits, too.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spence nicholson</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/04/24/leica-d-lux-5-in-photokina-2010.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>spence nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1162#comment-870</guid>
		<description>If these mockups come to fruition I would sell my DSLR, and get it in a heartbeat. This would be amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If these mockups come to fruition I would sell my DSLR, and get it in a heartbeat. This would be amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/04/24/leica-d-lux-5-in-photokina-2010.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1162#comment-868</guid>
		<description>been a bit crazy as of late, i still read and watch man, ;) i&#039;ll try to post a bit more though, i love this kinda stuff!
-peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>been a bit crazy as of late, i still read and watch man, <img src='http://leicarumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  i&#8217;ll try to post a bit more though, i love this kinda stuff!<br />
-peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LR admin</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/04/24/leica-d-lux-5-in-photokina-2010.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>LR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1162#comment-867</guid>
		<description>Hey Peter, good to hear from you again :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Peter, good to hear from you again <img src='http://leicarumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/04/24/leica-d-lux-5-in-photokina-2010.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1162#comment-866</guid>
		<description>lets hope so! cause that sure is a pretty looking camera, especially with that new cosina/voigtlander adapter, wow, i could dust off the old leica, kiev, and voigtlander lenses i have for my, now, mantle piece rangefinders (and without the remorse of buying a canon! ;) joke canon guys, back!! )
-peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lets hope so! cause that sure is a pretty looking camera, especially with that new cosina/voigtlander adapter, wow, i could dust off the old leica, kiev, and voigtlander lenses i have for my, now, mantle piece rangefinders (and without the remorse of buying a canon! <img src='http://leicarumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  joke canon guys, back!! )<br />
-peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->