<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leica M9 will not be the only announcement on September 9th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/</link>
	<description>No longer only for rumors, this is THE Leica Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GTW</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1700</link>
		<dc:creator>GTW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1700</guid>
		<description>Soeren,

&gt; I cannot for the life of me understand why they would announce the M9 on september 9

Because it&#039;s 9/9/09 which is kind of in tune with M9 maybe? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soeren,</p>
<p>&gt; I cannot for the life of me understand why they would announce the M9 on september 9</p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s 9/9/09 which is kind of in tune with M9 maybe? <img src='http://leicarumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soeren</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1698</link>
		<dc:creator>Soeren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1698</guid>
		<description>I cannot for the life of me understand why they would announce the M9 on september 9, when the IFA fair in Berlin is from the 4th to the 9th of september. So maybe the 9th is the dealer availability date ??

Soeren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot for the life of me understand why they would announce the M9 on september 9, when the IFA fair in Berlin is from the 4th to the 9th of september. So maybe the 9th is the dealer availability date ??</p>
<p>Soeren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJS</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>JJS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>heinz: &quot;An R to S adaptor? Or R to F and R to EF adaptors?&quot;

As I&#039;ve posted elsewhere, my &quot;if I ran the world&quot; favorite would be an R to S adaptor, which would require an extender/teleconverter or a relay lens to make up for the fact that mount-to-film distance on the S is (likely) greater than on the R. A teleconverter would allow the full use of the larger sensor.  A 1:1 relay lens would create cropped circular images, which could be fun. This would be pretty tricky for wide-angle lenses, but would work great with telephotos.

Still, my bet is on an AF-DSLR with the R/ROM mount that just isn&#039;t called an R10. Perhaps a &quot;D3&quot;? Or an &quot;RX&quot;, like Apple&#039;s OS &quot;10&quot;? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heinz: &#8220;An R to S adaptor? Or R to F and R to EF adaptors?&#8221;</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve posted elsewhere, my &#8220;if I ran the world&#8221; favorite would be an R to S adaptor, which would require an extender/teleconverter or a relay lens to make up for the fact that mount-to-film distance on the S is (likely) greater than on the R. A teleconverter would allow the full use of the larger sensor.  A 1:1 relay lens would create cropped circular images, which could be fun. This would be pretty tricky for wide-angle lenses, but would work great with telephotos.</p>
<p>Still, my bet is on an AF-DSLR with the R/ROM mount that just isn&#8217;t called an R10. Perhaps a &#8220;D3&#8243;? Or an &#8220;RX&#8221;, like Apple&#8217;s OS &#8220;10&#8243;? <img src='http://leicarumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joachim</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>Joachim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>The &quot;very interesting camera&quot; may be a digital Leica CM (built-in objective, optical view finder) with image sensor greater than 4/3 and excellent image quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;very interesting camera&#8221; may be a digital Leica CM (built-in objective, optical view finder) with image sensor greater than 4/3 and excellent image quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Idea</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1654</link>
		<dc:creator>An Idea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1654</guid>
		<description>M9 with Canon Sensor and Leica R lenses for Canon EF direct mount?  An interesting news if it come.

Or a new Canon 5D II with Leica R-Mount!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M9 with Canon Sensor and Leica R lenses for Canon EF direct mount?  An interesting news if it come.</p>
<p>Or a new Canon 5D II with Leica R-Mount!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heinz</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>heinz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>An R to S adaptor? Or R to F and R to EF adaptors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An R to S adaptor? Or R to F and R to EF adaptors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1650</guid>
		<description>No, I don&#039;t mean the Panasonic GF1, I meant that the &quot;very interesting&quot; camera could simply be just the Leica D-LUX 5 (i.e. the Leica version of the LX4) and that a D-SLR for R-lenses is not coming at this moment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t mean the Panasonic GF1, I meant that the &#8220;very interesting&#8221; camera could simply be just the Leica D-LUX 5 (i.e. the Leica version of the LX4) and that a D-SLR for R-lenses is not coming at this moment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NikoDoby</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1649</link>
		<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1649</guid>
		<description>Bingo anonymous, but we shall see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bingo anonymous, but we shall see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1648</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1648</guid>
		<description>â€œthere will be no R10 from Leica, but there will be a good solution that allows us to use our R-lenses on a digital bodyâ€œ

That could be as little as an Leice R to M adapter with data coupling and the M9 having some kind of live-view for focussing...
He said &#039;solution&#039;, not &#039;camera&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œthere will be no R10 from Leica, but there will be a good solution that allows us to use our R-lenses on a digital bodyâ€œ</p>
<p>That could be as little as an Leice R to M adapter with data coupling and the M9 having some kind of live-view for focussing&#8230;<br />
He said &#8217;solution&#8217;, not &#8216;camera&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody Special</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody Special</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>I could see (eventually) a GF1 style body for R glass. It&#039;s a new design for a body, and one that would be interesting to see with a full frame sensor, of course it would be bigger. Just keep the new stuff coming, as an R user, I would love to see a Leica FF body,  certainly I welcome an M9 also.

Let&#039;s hope it&#039;s not all rumors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see (eventually) a GF1 style body for R glass. It&#8217;s a new design for a body, and one that would be interesting to see with a full frame sensor, of course it would be bigger. Just keep the new stuff coming, as an R user, I would love to see a Leica FF body,  certainly I welcome an M9 also.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s not all rumors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NikoDoby</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1646</link>
		<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1646</guid>
		<description>I think it will just be the limited edition white S2 :^)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it will just be the limited edition white S2 :^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>I hope they introduce a digital visoflex.  This way they could keep the M9 minimal and lovely, but with the ability to transform into a fully functional slr with a more modernized feature pallet than the previous visoflexes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they introduce a digital visoflex.  This way they could keep the M9 minimal and lovely, but with the ability to transform into a fully functional slr with a more modernized feature pallet than the previous visoflexes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LR admin</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>LR admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>You mean the Panasonic GF1:
http://photorumors.com/2009/08/06/panasonic-gf1-micro-four-thirds/

Leica said they will stay away from m4/3 - unless they changed their mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean the Panasonic GF1:<br />
<a href="http://photorumors.com/2009/08/06/panasonic-gf1-micro-four-thirds/" rel="nofollow">http://photorumors.com/2009/08/06/panasonic-gf1-micro-four-thirds/</a></p>
<p>Leica said they will stay away from m4/3 &#8211; unless they changed their mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>Or just the Leica version of the Panasonic LX4?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or just the Leica version of the Panasonic LX4?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frenchy</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/21/leica-m9-will-not-be-the-only-announcement-on-september-9th.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>frenchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1911#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>Maybe a new cam taking the R lenses with an AF module derivated from the S2 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a new cam taking the R lenses with an AF module derivated from the S2 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->