<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Are those the first Leica M9 pictures?</title> <atom:link href="http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/</link> <description>Leica news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Nokton</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1795</link> <dc:creator>Nokton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:51:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1995#comment-1795</guid> <description>The M9 will have built in IR filter and no need for additional UV/IR filter. Otherwise will be exactly like an M8.2 with a few more bells and whistles in the menu.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The M9 will have built in IR filter and no need for additional UV/IR filter. Otherwise will be exactly like an M8.2 with a few more bells and whistles in the menu.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JR</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1761</link> <dc:creator>JR</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:56:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1995#comment-1761</guid> <description>wasn&#039;t there a rumor floating around about a digital CL rf camera?i think we will see a FF M9, aps-h digital cl, and a larger sensor dlux-5</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wasn&#8217;t there a rumor floating around about a digital CL rf camera?</p><p>i think we will see a FF M9, aps-h digital cl, and a larger sensor dlux-5</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: justin</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1755</link> <dc:creator>justin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:05:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1995#comment-1755</guid> <description>The other main difference I see is the smooth leatherette instead of the large, rough kind on the 8.2...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other main difference I see is the smooth leatherette instead of the large, rough kind on the 8.2&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LeicaNut</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1754</link> <dc:creator>LeicaNut</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:51:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1995#comment-1754</guid> <description>..and one of the cameras will be in m4/3</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..and one of the cameras will be in m4/3</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LR admin</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1747</link> <dc:creator>LR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:49:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1995#comment-1747</guid> <description>No word on the sensor yet, but I guess it will be Kodak.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No word on the sensor yet, but I guess it will be Kodak.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1745</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:57:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1995#comment-1745</guid> <description>So it&#039;s the 18mp canon 7D APS-C sensor in an M8 body after all then?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it&#8217;s the 18mp canon 7D APS-C sensor in an M8 body after all then?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Al</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1742</link> <dc:creator>Al</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:18:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1995#comment-1742</guid> <description>Also take a look at the top plate left corner with a cut out like the old rewind crank area - MP /M3, new menu options Lens detection = &quot;Auto&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also take a look at the top plate left corner with a cut out like the old rewind crank area &#8211; MP /M3, new menu options Lens detection = &#8220;Auto&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: giac0</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1739</link> <dc:creator>giac0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:17:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1995#comment-1739</guid> <description>Beutyful!So it seem that the didn&#039;t need to make a bigger camera for the bigger sensor :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beutyful!</p><p>So it seem that the didn&#8217;t need to make a bigger camera for the bigger sensor <img
src='http://leicarumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carlo</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1738</link> <dc:creator>Carlo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:49:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1995#comment-1738</guid> <description>The M8 has a 1/8000 setting which here there is not.
The M8.2 has an S setting which here there is not.
Also, in the video you can clearly see a dedicated ISO button which is not present on the M8 nor the M8.2.
Hence... here is the M9!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The M8 has a 1/8000 setting which here there is not.<br
/> The M8.2 has an S setting which here there is not.<br
/> Also, in the video you can clearly see a dedicated ISO button which is not present on the M8 nor the M8.2.<br
/> Hence&#8230; here is the M9!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AndrÃ©</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1737</link> <dc:creator>AndrÃ©</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:45:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1995#comment-1737</guid> <description>If you notice it only goes to 1/4000, so it must be a m8.2, but i don&#039;t see any inscription of m8.2 on the flash shoe.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you notice it only goes to 1/4000, so it must be a m8.2, but i don&#8217;t see any inscription of m8.2 on the flash shoe.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: giac0</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1736</link> <dc:creator>giac0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:35:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1995#comment-1736</guid> <description>I think that the use of the NOVICE word should be a suggestion for the target of the new product...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the use of the NOVICE word should be a suggestion for the target of the new product&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: giac0</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/08/31/are-those-the-first-leica-m9-pictures.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1735</link> <dc:creator>giac0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:33:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=1995#comment-1735</guid> <description>I guess it&#039;s just an M8.... where are the differences? i can&#039;t see anyone</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it&#8217;s just an M8&#8230;. where are the differences? i can&#8217;t see anyone</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 422/426 objects using memcached

Served from: leicarumors.com @ 2012-02-08 19:57:43 -->
