<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Leica X1 specs?</title> <atom:link href="http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/</link> <description>Leica news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Vernon Leow</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1965</link> <dc:creator>Vernon Leow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:47:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1965</guid> <description>Specs will be similar to the Panasonic GF-1. It will use Micro 4/3 mount lenses but because it has a bigger sensor (1.5x rather than 2.0x), it is technically not a Micro 4/3 camera so they were not lying when they said they won&#039;t make a Micro 4/3 camera. It will have the optional Electronic Viewfinder that adjusts according to the lens mounted.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Specs will be similar to the Panasonic GF-1. It will use Micro 4/3 mount lenses but because it has a bigger sensor (1.5x rather than 2.0x), it is technically not a Micro 4/3 camera so they were not lying when they said they won&#8217;t make a Micro 4/3 camera. It will have the optional Electronic Viewfinder that adjusts according to the lens mounted.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hexar</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1942</link> <dc:creator>hexar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 18:38:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1942</guid> <description>will the X1 have an electronic level like the Ricoh GRD and Oly EP1 have  ?
Any ideas if this could be a Leica &quot;issue&quot; ?
(it is soooo helpfull especially in wide angle fotography)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will the X1 have an electronic level like the Ricoh GRD and Oly EP1 have  ?<br
/> Any ideas if this could be a Leica &#8220;issue&#8221; ?<br
/> (it is soooo helpfull especially in wide angle fotography)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joachim</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1934</link> <dc:creator>Joachim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 12:37:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1934</guid> <description>To Chow:  &quot;Fixed focus won&#039;t make sense&quot;.  But the X1 will have an objective with fixed focal length;  please note the difference.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Chow:  &#8220;Fixed focus won&#8217;t make sense&#8221;.  But the X1 will have an objective with fixed focal length;  please note the difference.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hexar</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1933</link> <dc:creator>hexar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:06:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1933</guid> <description>THIS IS MY LONG AWAITED DIGITAL VERSION OF THE konica hexar af !!
Are there more HEXAR AF users getting exited here ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS IS MY LONG AWAITED DIGITAL VERSION OF THE konica hexar af !!<br
/> Are there more HEXAR AF users getting exited here ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christian Louis</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1919</link> <dc:creator>Christian Louis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:59:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1919</guid> <description>New informations/rumor (pdf file) seems to say these specifications (m4/3 etc.) are false and the photo is true.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New informations/rumor (pdf file) seems to say these specifications (m4/3 etc.) are false and the photo is true.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chow</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1908</link> <dc:creator>Chow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 11:03:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1908</guid> <description>Just doesn&#039;t make sense for Leica to launch a different system of interchangeable lenses. So I think it&#039;s either fake or m43. Fixed focus won&#039;t make sense either I think. Who wants to pay enormous amounts of money for a fixed lens cam.
I guess in a few days from now we all know..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just doesn&#8217;t make sense for Leica to launch a different system of interchangeable lenses. So I think it&#8217;s either fake or m43. Fixed focus won&#8217;t make sense either I think. Who wants to pay enormous amounts of money for a fixed lens cam.<br
/> I guess in a few days from now we all know..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mingmac</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1900</link> <dc:creator>mingmac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:15:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1900</guid> <description>Ah!!! I cannot wait to see the real one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah!!! I cannot wait to see the real one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1897</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:43:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1897</guid> <description>The word &quot;affordable&quot; means different things to different people. Unfortunately I don&#039;t think Leica&#039;s definition is the same as mine :(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word &#8220;affordable&#8221; means different things to different people. Unfortunately I don&#8217;t think Leica&#8217;s definition is the same as mine <img
src='http://leicarumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: xavier</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1896</link> <dc:creator>xavier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:38:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1896</guid> <description>PS : I remember not so long ago that Leica CEO said there would be an affordable digital Leica camera...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS : I remember not so long ago that Leica CEO said there would be an affordable digital Leica camera&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: xavier</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1895</link> <dc:creator>xavier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:36:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1895</guid> <description>the look is not a &quot;Leica look&quot; and i would rather see a Leica version of the Panasonic GF1, with new real Leica lenses. It is maybe the surprise we are all going to have on the 999 !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the look is not a &#8220;Leica look&#8221; and i would rather see a Leica version of the Panasonic GF1, with new real Leica lenses. It is maybe the surprise we are all going to have on the 999 !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LR admin</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1891</link> <dc:creator>LR admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:32:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1891</guid> <description>This is what I was thinking as well and the X1 will have a fixed lens, not a Interchangeable one. I think this rumor is busted.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I was thinking as well and the X1 will have a fixed lens, not a Interchangeable one. I think this rumor is busted.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1890</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:20:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1890</guid> <description>Those are the specs for the GF1.  The X1 is NOT a mFT camera.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are the specs for the GF1.  The X1 is NOT a mFT camera.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: helios</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1887</link> <dc:creator>helios</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:49:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1887</guid> <description>still no price info? not even a clue? cant imagine they could double the price on the competition. $1200?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still no price info? not even a clue? cant imagine they could double the price on the competition. $1200?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christian Louis</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1884</link> <dc:creator>Christian Louis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:54:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1884</guid> <description>In my opinion, the photo is a mock up : not coated lens and so on The specifications are the same as the pana gf1. If Leica goes with pana in the m4/3, it&#039;s a good information.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, the photo is a mock up : not coated lens and so on The specifications are the same as the pana gf1. If Leica goes with pana in the m4/3, it&#8217;s a good information.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1883</link> <dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:45:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1883</guid> <description>Hi... one other thing, if this picture is accurate, its not the same as the GF1 due to the fact that this has a manual dial for shutter speed while the GF1 does not. This seems more old school. I still worry about lack of a view finder there. Think that is a deal breaker for me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&#8230; one other thing, if this picture is accurate, its not the same as the GF1 due to the fact that this has a manual dial for shutter speed while the GF1 does not. This seems more old school. I still worry about lack of a view finder there. Think that is a deal breaker for me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1882</link> <dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:32:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1882</guid> <description>Sorry, I forgot to add :Pick the wrong</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I forgot to add :</p><p>Pick the wrong</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1881</link> <dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:28:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1881</guid> <description>M9... is what I like! What about a panasonic version though? Then we could be talking. I don&#039;t care about cameras, only lenses - unless you are talking about film...then cameras matter. Digital cameras are nothing more than a shell around the sensor and sensor technology is changed every few months so give me a cheap panasonic camera with the same sensor as the Leica and I will keep my leica lenses and buy a new pana camera every 6 months with the newest and best sensor.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M9&#8230; is what I like! What about a panasonic version though? Then we could be talking. I don&#8217;t care about cameras, only lenses &#8211; unless you are talking about film&#8230;then cameras matter. Digital cameras are nothing more than a shell around the sensor and sensor technology is changed every few months so give me a cheap panasonic camera with the same sensor as the Leica and I will keep my leica lenses and buy a new pana camera every 6 months with the newest and best sensor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fiatlux</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1879</link> <dc:creator>fiatlux</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:48:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1879</guid> <description>I don&#039;t find pick the wrong
the specs pick the wrong
so confusing pick the wrong
It&#039;s just a pick the wrong
copy of the pick the wrong
GF-1 specs pick the wrong
which is pick the wrong
rather plausible pick the wrong
;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t find pick the wrong<br
/> the specs pick the wrong<br
/> so confusing pick the wrong<br
/> It&#8217;s just a pick the wrong<br
/> copy of the pick the wrong<br
/> GF-1 specs pick the wrong<br
/> which is pick the wrong<br
/> rather plausible pick the wrong<br
/> <img
src='http://leicarumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter Lustig</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/04/leica-x1-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1877</link> <dc:creator>Peter Lustig</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2109#comment-1877</guid> <description>Leica X1 will base on the Panasonic Micro FourThirds Lumix GF1 - Flash, Control dial, Shutter release, Flash-Shoe - all the same position with the Lumix. Both 12MP... And they already cooperate with the D-Lux modells... and remember the New Leica Lens that Panasonic is offering for the GF1.So this X1 will be the Leica version of a Micro FourThirds camera - I am sure.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leica X1 will base on the Panasonic Micro FourThirds Lumix GF1 &#8211; Flash, Control dial, Shutter release, Flash-Shoe &#8211; all the same position with the Lumix. Both 12MP&#8230; And they already cooperate with the D-Lux modells&#8230; and remember the New Leica Lens that Panasonic is offering for the GF1.</p><p>So this X1 will be the Leica version of a Micro FourThirds camera &#8211; I am sure.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 539/557 objects using memcached

Served from: leicarumors.com @ 2012-02-08 01:05:39 -->
