<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Leica M9 &amp; Leica X1 links, reviews, etc.</title> <atom:link href="http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/09/leica-m9-leica-x1-links-reviews-etc.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/09/leica-m9-leica-x1-links-reviews-etc.aspx/</link> <description>Leica news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/09/leica-m9-leica-x1-links-reviews-etc.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2067</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:09:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2226#comment-2067</guid> <description>Here&#039;s a link to audio of the X1&#039;s shutter. It&#039;s very quiethttp://luminous-landscape.com/videos/x1.shtml</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a link to audio of the X1&#8242;s shutter. It&#8217;s very quiet</p><p><a
href="http://luminous-landscape.com/videos/x1.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://luminous-landscape.com/videos/x1.shtml</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/09/leica-m9-leica-x1-links-reviews-etc.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2064</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:23:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2226#comment-2064</guid> <description>Those examples make the Nikon D3X look pretty darn good. The M9 is sharper but at 800ISO noise goes from bad to worse.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those examples make the Nikon D3X look pretty darn good. The M9 is sharper but at 800ISO noise goes from bad to worse.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/09/leica-m9-leica-x1-links-reviews-etc.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2053</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:57:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2226#comment-2053</guid> <description>Why do the high iso samples look so noisy compared with competitors?
I mean itâ€™s a full sensor, isnt it?http://www.optyczne.pl/2204-nowo%C5%9B%C4%87-Leica_M9_i_jej_pe%C5%82noklatkowi_konkurenci_-_por%C3%B3wnanie_RAW.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do the high iso samples look so noisy compared with competitors?<br
/> I mean itâ€™s a full sensor, isnt it?</p><p><a
href="http://www.optyczne.pl/2204-nowo%C5%9B%C4%87-Leica_M9_i_jej_pe%C5%82noklatkowi_konkurenci_-_por%C3%B3wnanie_RAW.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.optyczne.pl/2204-nowo%C5%9B%C4%87-Leica_M9_i_jej_pe%C5%82noklatkowi_konkurenci_-_por%C3%B3wnanie_RAW.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fotomik</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/09/leica-m9-leica-x1-links-reviews-etc.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2050</link> <dc:creator>fotomik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:44:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2226#comment-2050</guid> <description>The Polish link for the RAW-comparison works. Who needs words?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Polish link for the RAW-comparison works. Who needs words?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/09/leica-m9-leica-x1-links-reviews-etc.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2042</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:35:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2226#comment-2042</guid> <description>X 1 looks like s.... men!!!no way this s going to sell!A  LUMIX GF1is better and can use both M and R lenses!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X 1 looks like s&#8230;. men!!!no way this s going to sell!A  LUMIX GF1is better and can use both M and R lenses!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JR</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/09/leica-m9-leica-x1-links-reviews-etc.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2036</link> <dc:creator>JR</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:43:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2226#comment-2036</guid> <description>sample images and raw comparison appears to be down.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sample images and raw comparison appears to be down.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 311/326 objects using memcached

Served from: leicarumors.com @ 2012-02-08 19:43:36 -->
