<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Leica C-LUX 3 + free accessory kit &#8211; $75 mail-in rebate = good deal</title> <atom:link href="http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/18/leica-c-lux-3-free-accessory-kit-75-mail-in-rebate-good-deal.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/18/leica-c-lux-3-free-accessory-kit-75-mail-in-rebate-good-deal.aspx/</link> <description>Leica news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: NikoDoby</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/18/leica-c-lux-3-free-accessory-kit-75-mail-in-rebate-good-deal.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2200</link> <dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:22:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2440#comment-2200</guid> <description>Which Leica is biased on the Panasonic LX3 again? It&#039;s the D-Lux 4 right? Not the C-Lux3?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Leica is biased on the Panasonic LX3 again? It&#8217;s the D-Lux 4 right? Not the C-Lux3?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 231/235 objects using memcached

Served from: leicarumors.com @ 2012-02-08 21:37:35 -->
