<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leica C-LUX 3 + free accessory kit &#8211; $75 mail-in rebate = good deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/18/leica-c-lux-3-free-accessory-kit-75-mail-in-rebate-good-deal.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/18/leica-c-lux-3-free-accessory-kit-75-mail-in-rebate-good-deal.aspx/</link>
	<description>Leica news, before they happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:03:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: NikoDoby</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/09/18/leica-c-lux-3-free-accessory-kit-75-mail-in-rebate-good-deal.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>NikoDoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=2440#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>Which Leica is biased on the Panasonic LX3 again? It&#039;s the D-Lux 4 right? Not the C-Lux3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Leica is biased on the Panasonic LX3 again? It&#8217;s the D-Lux 4 right? Not the C-Lux3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
