<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Noctilux does NYC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leicarumors.com/2009/12/10/noctilux-does-nyc.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/12/10/noctilux-does-nyc.aspx/</link>
	<description>Leica news, before it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/12/10/noctilux-does-nyc.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2774</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=3252#comment-2774</guid>
		<description>Do you need such an expensive lens to take a good picture in most situations?  Obviously not.  You don&#039;t even need a Leica (dare I say!) (Chase Chavez with an iPhone is awesome).  (I say most situations because you do need an expensive lens like a 400mm f/2.8 or a 600mm /4.0 to take decent wildlife pictures, and those lenses are expensive).

Does it necessarily follow that if you are rich and have a bunch of camera equipment, that you are necessarily a bad photographer who has never taken a decent picture?  Or that if you did it&#039;s out of pure luck and skill?  I don&#039;t know, but I think that is a bit of stereotype.  Is that much different than saying that poor people who have cheap camera equipment are more likely to take decent pictures?  Again, I don&#039;t know since I&#039;ve never conducted a controlled study myself . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you need such an expensive lens to take a good picture in most situations?  Obviously not.  You don&#8217;t even need a Leica (dare I say!) (Chase Chavez with an iPhone is awesome).  (I say most situations because you do need an expensive lens like a 400mm f/2.8 or a 600mm /4.0 to take decent wildlife pictures, and those lenses are expensive).</p>
<p>Does it necessarily follow that if you are rich and have a bunch of camera equipment, that you are necessarily a bad photographer who has never taken a decent picture?  Or that if you did it&#8217;s out of pure luck and skill?  I don&#8217;t know, but I think that is a bit of stereotype.  Is that much different than saying that poor people who have cheap camera equipment are more likely to take decent pictures?  Again, I don&#8217;t know since I&#8217;ve never conducted a controlled study myself . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Koelsch</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/12/10/noctilux-does-nyc.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2773</link>
		<dc:creator>John Koelsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=3252#comment-2773</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, wondering back a bit to the days of the ailing and starving Edward Weston on Wildcat Hill near Carmel. Wonder what EW would think of all these rich city boy shutterbugs...who&#039;ve never taken a decent picture but have all the latest toys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, wondering back a bit to the days of the ailing and starving Edward Weston on Wildcat Hill near Carmel. Wonder what EW would think of all these rich city boy shutterbugs&#8230;who&#8217;ve never taken a decent picture but have all the latest toys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mingmac</title>
		<link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/12/10/noctilux-does-nyc.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2772</link>
		<dc:creator>mingmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=3252#comment-2772</guid>
		<description>$ 10,000 Oooooooooh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$ 10,000 Oooooooooh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

