<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Noctilux does NYC</title> <atom:link href="http://leicarumors.com/2009/12/10/noctilux-does-nyc.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/12/10/noctilux-does-nyc.aspx/</link> <description>Leica news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/12/10/noctilux-does-nyc.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2774</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:28:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=3252#comment-2774</guid> <description>Do you need such an expensive lens to take a good picture in most situations?  Obviously not.  You don&#039;t even need a Leica (dare I say!) (Chase Chavez with an iPhone is awesome).  (I say most situations because you do need an expensive lens like a 400mm f/2.8 or a 600mm /4.0 to take decent wildlife pictures, and those lenses are expensive).Does it necessarily follow that if you are rich and have a bunch of camera equipment, that you are necessarily a bad photographer who has never taken a decent picture?  Or that if you did it&#039;s out of pure luck and skill?  I don&#039;t know, but I think that is a bit of stereotype.  Is that much different than saying that poor people who have cheap camera equipment are more likely to take decent pictures?  Again, I don&#039;t know since I&#039;ve never conducted a controlled study myself . . .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you need such an expensive lens to take a good picture in most situations?  Obviously not.  You don&#8217;t even need a Leica (dare I say!) (Chase Chavez with an iPhone is awesome).  (I say most situations because you do need an expensive lens like a 400mm f/2.8 or a 600mm /4.0 to take decent wildlife pictures, and those lenses are expensive).</p><p>Does it necessarily follow that if you are rich and have a bunch of camera equipment, that you are necessarily a bad photographer who has never taken a decent picture?  Or that if you did it&#8217;s out of pure luck and skill?  I don&#8217;t know, but I think that is a bit of stereotype.  Is that much different than saying that poor people who have cheap camera equipment are more likely to take decent pictures?  Again, I don&#8217;t know since I&#8217;ve never conducted a controlled study myself . . .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Koelsch</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/12/10/noctilux-does-nyc.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2773</link> <dc:creator>John Koelsch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:08:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=3252#comment-2773</guid> <description>Hmmm, wondering back a bit to the days of the ailing and starving Edward Weston on Wildcat Hill near Carmel. Wonder what EW would think of all these rich city boy shutterbugs...who&#039;ve never taken a decent picture but have all the latest toys.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, wondering back a bit to the days of the ailing and starving Edward Weston on Wildcat Hill near Carmel. Wonder what EW would think of all these rich city boy shutterbugs&#8230;who&#8217;ve never taken a decent picture but have all the latest toys.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mingmac</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2009/12/10/noctilux-does-nyc.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-2772</link> <dc:creator>mingmac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:59:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=3252#comment-2772</guid> <description>$ 10,000 Oooooooooh</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$ 10,000 Oooooooooh</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 259/277 objects using memcached

Served from: leicarumors.com @ 2012-02-08 13:30:11 -->
