<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: New Leica 35mm Summilux M lens update</title> <atom:link href="http://leicarumors.com/2010/01/23/new-leica-35mm-summilux-m-lens-update.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://leicarumors.com/2010/01/23/new-leica-35mm-summilux-m-lens-update.aspx/</link> <description>Leica news, before it happens</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2010/01/23/new-leica-35mm-summilux-m-lens-update.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3043</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:07:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=3705#comment-3043</guid> <description>I am happy to report that my Summilux 35mm has no focus shift problem of any kind on my M9.  And the bokeh on that lens rival that of my 50mm f/0.95.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am happy to report that my Summilux 35mm has no focus shift problem of any kind on my M9.  And the bokeh on that lens rival that of my 50mm f/0.95.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bertrand</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2010/01/23/new-leica-35mm-summilux-m-lens-update.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3038</link> <dc:creator>Bertrand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:34:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=3705#comment-3038</guid> <description>Floating elements are also associated with the correction of focus drift (&quot;focus shift&quot;),  a notorious feature of the current 35/1,4A, so I would not look further. Per Leitz standard, the M is limited to 0.7 m as closest focus point with rangefinder assistance; the Zeiss standard allows for 0.5 m. So Leica would have to adopt the Zeiss norm first ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Floating elements are also associated with the correction of focus drift (&#8220;focus shift&#8221;),  a notorious feature of the current 35/1,4A, so I would not look further. Per Leitz standard, the M is limited to 0.7 m as closest focus point with rangefinder assistance; the Zeiss standard allows for 0.5 m. So Leica would have to adopt the Zeiss norm first <img
src='http://leicarumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ralph Aichinger</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2010/01/23/new-leica-35mm-summilux-m-lens-update.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3037</link> <dc:creator>Ralph Aichinger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:53:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=3705#comment-3037</guid> <description>Interesting: Leica is upgrading its lenses with floating elements, a
feature normally associated with close range photography.Could this mean a different mechanical construction with the
ability to focus even more closely with a yet to be released LiveView M
body? Of course it would not make sense now, that the M9 is
so much in demand. But LiveView as an additional feature would
certainly cure one of the basic limitations of rangefinder cameras.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting: Leica is upgrading its lenses with floating elements, a<br
/> feature normally associated with close range photography.</p><p>Could this mean a different mechanical construction with the<br
/> ability to focus even more closely with a yet to be released LiveView M<br
/> body? Of course it would not make sense now, that the M9 is<br
/> so much in demand. But LiveView as an additional feature would<br
/> certainly cure one of the basic limitations of rangefinder cameras.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bertrand</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2010/01/23/new-leica-35mm-summilux-m-lens-update.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3035</link> <dc:creator>Bertrand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:44:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=3705#comment-3035</guid> <description>I thought that the 50/0,95A, like the 75/2AA and the 75/2,5 S, was based on the 50/1,4A design, so I don&#039;t quit understand the first bullet.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that the 50/0,95A, like the 75/2AA and the 75/2,5 S, was based on the 50/1,4A design, so I don&#8217;t quit understand the first bullet.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: leicamonster</title><link>http://leicarumors.com/2010/01/23/new-leica-35mm-summilux-m-lens-update.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3033</link> <dc:creator>leicamonster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:17:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://leicarumors.com/?p=3705#comment-3033</guid> <description>Can it get any better? My 35mm is so sharp.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can it get any better? My 35mm is so sharp.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 303/307 objects using memcached

Served from: leicarumors.com @ 2012-02-08 19:58:04 -->
