Quick Leica M9 vs. Fuji X-Pro1 image comparison

Today I will be comparing apples and oranges. The Leica M9 and Fuji X-Pro 1 are two completely different beasts. The only similarity is the way both cameras look. Well, actually there is more then that – both have optical viewfinders, similar megapixel counts (18MP vs. 16.3MP) and no anti-aliasing (AA) filter and that’s about it. I am not going in details to discuss the features and functions, instead I will just compare few images taken with the Leica M9 and Fuji X-Pro 1 cameras. This is not an easy task because Lightroom 4 currently does not support RAF files form the X-Pro 1 and the Silkypix RAW file converter (included with the X-Pro1) doesn’t support M9 DNG files. My only option at that point is to use JPG files taken directly from the X-Pro1. I may redo this test later with direct conversions from the RAW files. Obviously this is not a scientific comparison and it’s prone to user’s error. Click on images for larger view.

Wide open at f/1.4

Keep in mind that the M9 has a slightly higher resolution count. I took several shots with the M9 to make sure that the focus is correct – I would say the $600 Fujinon 35mm f/1.4 lens is a pretty good performer compared to the $4000 Summilux 50mm f/1.4:

Leica M9 at f/1.4 (100% crop)

Fuji X-Pro1 at f/1.4 (100% crop)


Leica M9 at f/2.8 (100% crop)

Fuji X-Pro1 at f/2.8 (100% crop)


To my eyes the Leica has a slightly more contrasty/saturated colors (ISO 200, f/2.8, 1/30):

Leica M9

Fuji X-Pro1


The Leica M9 has a shallow depth of field compared to the Fuji X-Pro1 because of its full frame sensor:

Leica M9, 50mm, f/1.4

Fuji X-Pro1, 35mm (50mm equivalent), f/1.4

Leica M9 bokeh sample

Fuji X-Pro1 bokeh sample

Leica M9 bokeh crop

Fuji X-Pro1 bokeh crop

ISO 2500

In terms of high ISO performance, the Fuji X-Pro 1 is a clear winner and probably has one of the best performing APS-C sensors out there. The Leica M9 camera is almost three years old – I will revisit this comparison once the next M camera is released later this year.

Leica M9 at ISO 2500

Fuji X-Pro1 at ISO 2500

Here are some more full size jpg samples taken in aperture priority with both cameras:


In my opinion both cameras have excellent and comparable image quality. The M9 is almost 3 years, the X-Pro1 is not full frame, manual vs. auto focus, price, functionality, simplicity of use, ergonomics, etc. should be driving factors if you are considering to purchase one of those cameras.

This entry was posted in Leica M9, LR Reviews and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.
  • FCC disclosure statement: this post may contain affiliate links or promotions that do not cost readers anything but help keep this website alive. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Thanks for your support!