The Leica Store Miami just listed for sale this Leica M9-P white limited edition camera set on their website (#23 out of 50). The price is $49,995.
This model was introduced back in 2012. Here is some additional information:
This model was introduced back in 2012. Here is some additional information:

Adobe released Lightroom version CC 2015.4 / 6.4 with support for the Leica M Typ 262 and Leica X-U Typ 113 cameras.
Support was added also for the following two lenses with Leica M mount:
| Mount | |
| Leica M | MS Optical Perar 28mm f/4 Super Triplet |
| Leica M | MS Optical Sonnetar 50mm f/1.1 MC |

For a limited time Leica Store San Francisco is offering 10% off on all used Leica cameras and lenses. Navigate to the used section for the full list of available equipment. Here is a picture of some of the used Leica gear available for sale:
Here are few more demo videos from the upcoming Techart adapter that will let you autofocus Leica M lenses on Sony a7 cameras (I will have more details on this adapter in early February, stay tuned):
by Louis Ferreira (http://500px.com/LouisFerreira)
Like many Leica faithful, I’m an M fan first. It’s one of the only cameras I have ever owned that compels me to get out and shoot. It’s also due for updating in the immediate future and I think we can make some predictions from the recent lens announcements.
The new enhanced image performance of the Summicrons and Elmarit that were announced recently hopefully hint at a higher megapixel sensor than the 24MP sensor seen in the Leica Q and SL. These lenses were already very good on the M240, but maybe they needed to be updated for the new sensor in the upcoming M.


DxOMark published their test results from the Leica SL Typ 601 camera – as you can see the SL offers a slightly better dynamic range compared to the M 240 and the Q, something Louis mentioned in his SL review:
Leica seems to have set up the SL sensor to offer better dynamic range around base ISO, which might have sacrificed some high ISO performance when compared to the Q, because 12,500 ISO is not as usable as it was on the Q. The SL has the potential to be sharper and has greater dynamic range than my M240 at low ISO, but I still would greatly prefer my Q and M240 when walking around a city at night.
More from DxOMark’s test results: